California · East Bay, South Bay, Peninsula, Marin

Property Management in the San Francisco Bay Area

A Bay Area owner with three buildings can sit under three different rent ordinances, with three different allowable percentages, three registration regimes, and three just-cause standards. Oakland, Berkeley, Alameda, Richmond, Hayward, Mountain View, and East Palo Alto each set their own annual increase, on their own reset date. AB 1482 is the floor everywhere else. Nobody self-manages across eight regulatory regimes correctly for long.

Bay Area, Q2 2026
Regional vacancy4.0%
Oakland asking rent~$2,654
San Jose asking rent~$3,437
Oakland rent growth, YoY~+13%
Cities with rent control7, plus SF
Kidder Mathews Bay Area Multifamily and mid-year Western US forecast, Q2 2026. Oakland rent growth: Apartment List, July 2026. Kidder reports the Bay Area as one market and does not break out submarket vacancy.
The owner's position

What Owners Are Up Against Here

01
Jurisdictional fragmentation
The rules follow the building’s physical address, not yours and not your manager’s. Three buildings in three cities means three compliance calendars, three allowable rates, and three sets of paperwork.
02
The widest spread in the region
Oakland asking rents were up roughly 13% year over year as of July 2026 while the local allowable increase sat at 0.8%. That is the largest gap between market and permitted rent anywhere in our footprint.
03
Submarket divergence
Oakland at roughly $2,654 per unit and San Jose at roughly $3,437 are not one market and cannot be priced as one. Regional comps will cost you money in both directions.
Our operating plan

How We Operate Across the Bay Area

01
A per-jurisdiction compliance matrix
Every building mapped to its ordinance, its coverage cutoff, its current allowable rate, and its reset month. Oakland resets August 1. San Francisco resets March 1. Berkeley is set annually by its own board. Missing a reset costs a full year of increase.
02
Banking rules tracked city by city
Oakland caps a banked increase at three times the current year’s CPI and requires it to include the current year. San Francisco does not work that way. Applying one city’s rule in another city is the most common expensive mistake in this market.
03
Submarket pricing, not regional pricing
Comps drawn at the submarket level. A Rockridge two-bedroom and a Fremont two-bedroom are not comparable, and averaging them produces a number that is wrong for both.
04
One owner, one report, many jurisdictions
If you own in three Bay Area cities, you get one statement, one portal, and one point of contact, with the per-building compliance position visible in the same place as the financials.
Compliance

Eight Ordinances, Eight Reset Dates

Seven Bay Area cities outside San Francisco run their own rent stabilization programs. Everywhere else in the region, AB 1482 governs.

CityCoverage cutoffIncrease basis
OaklandBuilt before January 1, 1983CPI via the Rent Adjustment Program, reset each August 1
BerkeleyBuilt before January 1, 1980Set annually by the Rent Board
Alameda5 or more units before February 1, 1995Lesser of 5% or 70% of CPI
RichmondMultifamily before February 1, 1995CPI via the Rent Program
HaywardBuilt before January 1, 1979CPI-linked
Mountain ViewMultifamily before February 1, 1995CPI-linked
East Palo AltoMost pre-1995 unitsCPI-based

All seven require just cause. AB 1482 applies where no local ordinance does: 5% plus local CPI to a maximum of 10%, with most single-family homes, condominiums, and housing built in the last fifteen years exempt.

Current as of August 2026. This is a summary written for property owners and is not legal advice. Rates and procedures change, and we track them per building.

Scope

What We Run in the Bay Area

Capability

Where We Work in the Bay Area

Across the East Bay, South Bay, Peninsula, and Marin. If your building is not in a city listed here, ask us anyway.

East Bay
Oakland, Berkeley, Alameda, Emeryville, Richmond, Hayward, San Leandro, Fremont, Walnut Creek, Concord.
South Bay
San Jose, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale, Mountain View, Palo Alto, East Palo Alto.
Peninsula
Redwood City, San Mateo, Burlingame, Daly City.
Marin
San Rafael, Mill Valley, Sausalito, Novato.
Owner questions

Bay Area Answers

Outside San Francisco, seven cities run local rent stabilization programs: Oakland, Berkeley, Alameda, Richmond, Hayward, Mountain View, and East Palo Alto. Each sets its own allowable increase and its own coverage cutoff, and all seven require just cause for termination. Everywhere else in the region, the state Tenant Protection Act applies instead.

Oakland’s allowable increase is set by the Rent Adjustment Program and resets every August 1, based on CPI. Because the rate changes annually and banked increases are capped at three times the current year’s CPI, the correct number depends on the unit’s full increase history. We confirm the current published rate with the program directly before serving any notice.

Coverage follows the building’s physical address, so an unincorporated parcel is generally outside the nearest city’s ordinance. AB 1482 still applies at the state level unless the property is exempt. This is one of the most frequently misread situations in the region and it is worth confirming per parcel rather than per neighborhood.

Usually not. The Tenant Protection Act exempts most single-family homes and condominiums, provided the owner is not a corporation or real estate investment trust and the required notice has been given to the tenant. Housing built within the last fifteen years is also exempt. The exemption is conditional, so the notice language matters.

That is precisely the case we are built for. You get one statement, one portal, and one point of contact, with each building tracked against its own ordinance, allowable rate, and reset date.

Send Us Your Addresses

Give us the addresses and we will map each one to its ordinance, its current allowable increase, and its reset date, so you can see the whole portfolio’s compliance position in one place.